AI and accounting;
How to adopt AI in your accounting firm without losing your clients
23/7/2026
In short: you can adopt AI without losing clients, provided you retain the CPA as the responsible signatory, define the parameters of each tool (data, provider, usage), comply with Bill 25 and the transparency expected by the Quebec CPA Order, and clearly communicate this to your clients. AI performs the repetitive tasks, while the professional validates and approves the results.
What AI is replacing isn't your firm, but the mechanical aspects of your work: data entry, categorization, reconciliation, and initial drafting of memos. What clients still want is a vetted human being who understands their situation, signs their financial statements, and is accountable for their advice to the professional body. It is precisely this combination—the automation of repetitive tasks and the preservation of sound judgment—that distinguishes a thriving firm from one that suffers.
The Quebec CPA Order is not hindering this adoption; it is providing a framework. Its Guide to Best Practices in Artificial Intelligence lays down a simple rule to remember before going any further: the CPA remains responsible for the work, regardless of the tool that produced it. AI never dilutes your professional responsibility; it shifts it to oversight.
The dividing line must be written, not implied. In a practice, every task assigned to an AI tool must have a designated human oversight point. Here is the breakdown to be documented:
A good practice is to maintain a record of the firm's AI usage: which tool, on which data, and validated by whom. This record becomes your proof of due diligence should a client, the professional order, or the Commission d'accès à l'information (CAI) ask questions.
1. Map your tasks before buying a tool. List what is repetitive, requires little judgment, and is high-volume: these are your top candidates. Keep out of the scope anything related to opinion, tax planning, and signing.
2. Qualify the provider, not just the functionality. Where is the data hosted? Is it used to train the model? Does the provider offer a written agreement? Under Bill 25, disclosing customers' personal information to a third party outside Quebec requires a privacy impact assessment. A free, consumer-grade tool that consumes your downloads is not compliant.
3. Appoint a data protection officer. Bill 25 already requires this for all businesses in Quebec. This person approves each new AI tool before its deployment.
4. Keep the CPA on the critical path. No AI output goes to the client without human review. Drafting speeds up, but it never replaces professional endorsement.
5. Document and train. A one-page internal policy, known to the team, is better than a powerful tool used without a framework.
Three obligations directly concern a firm integrating AI. First, transparency regarding automated decisions: Bill 25 specifically addresses decisions based solely on the automated processing of personal data; in such cases, the client must be informed and have the information used corrected. In practice, since you retain a CPA who reviews and signs decisions, you fall outside this strict definition, but the principle of transparency remains an expectation. Second, data minimization: only input the strictly necessary data into a tool. Finally, data transfer management: document and assess all data leaving Quebec, which is common with cloud-based AI tools.
The Access to Information Commission is the leading authority on these matters. Addressing these requirements proactively prevents you from having to rebuild your processes afterward.
The client's fear isn't that you're using AI. It's losing the human element responsible for their case. Your message should therefore be positive and clear: "We use AI to accelerate repetitive tasks, freeing up time for your tax strategy and decisions. A CPA reviews and signs everything that concerns you." Frame the benefit for the client, not the technology for its own sake.
Cette posture est aussi un argument d'acquisition. Les entrepreneurs qui cherchent aujourd'hui un comptable veulent précisément un professionnel à l'aise avec l'IA mais qui reste responsable. C'est le profil que Bankeo qualifie et met de l'avant. Sur les 15 000+ demandes reçues depuis 2023, la valeur ajoutée n'a jamais été le volume, mais le bon jumelage : la crédibilité de chaque cabinet est évaluée via l'Indice Bankeo, plus de 20 critères, pour rassurer le client sur le sérieux du professionnel derrière l'outil.
It actually saves you money if it funds consulting time, and loses you money if it replaces the relationship. A firm that automates data entry to promptly remind clients about tax optimization creates perceived value. A firm that automates to distance itself from the client erodes the one thing software cannot replicate: trust and the signed agreement.
This is also what qualified clients are looking for, whom Bankeo directs to firms within its network. The model is simple and transparent: the professional retains 100% of their fees, Bankeo is free for the entrepreneur, and the firm contributes through a fee per completed case—a fixed amount known in advance, never a percentage of your fees. Discover how it works from the professional's perspective on the Bankeo Pro page, and delve deeper into the subject in our AI and Accounting dossier.
Adopting AI is therefore not a technological gamble. It is an organizational decision: defining what the machine performs, protecting what the CPA approves, and communicating this clearly. Firms that do this work do not lose clients. They become the type of firm that clients in the AI age actively seek out.
Yes. The Order regulates the use of AI rather than prohibiting it, notably through its Guide to Good Practices in Artificial Intelligence. The central rule: the CPA remains accountable for the work produced, regardless of the tool used. AI never reduces your professional responsibility.
Only if the provider offers written guarantees, you limit the data to what is strictly necessary, and you evaluate any transfer outside Quebec. A free, consumer-grade tool that reuses your downloads to train its model is not compliant. Appoint a privacy officer to validate each tool.
Law 25 specifically targets decisions based solely on automated processing: in this particular case, the client must be informed. Since you retain a CPA who reviews and signs off on these decisions, you don't fall strictly under this requirement, but transparency remains an expected best practice. Frame it positively: AI speeds up repetitive tasks, while a CPA reviews and signs everything related to the client.
Not if AI funds consulting time instead of replacing the relationship. Clients aren't afraid of technology; they fear losing the human being who handles their case. A firm that automates to provide better advice strengthens trust.
Map your tasks: identify what is repetitive, requires little judgment, and is high-volume. These are your prime candidates for automation. Keep advice, tax planning, and signatures out of the scope; these remain the responsibility of a professional.
Bankeo connects clients with firms in its network who value a professional comfortable with AI but who remains responsible. The model is transparent: the firm retains 100% of its fees, Bankeo is free for the entrepreneur, and the firm's contribution takes the form of a fee per completed case, a fixed amount known in advance, never a percentage of your fees.
General information provided for guidance purposes only, reflecting the current 2026 tax regulations. It does not replace the advice of an accountant or chartered accountant: always consult a professional for your specific situation.
Bankeo account pairing is 100% free, always. You only pay your accountant directly.
We can present you with the right accountant from our network, for your needs, with as many profiles as you require.
We will support you for as long as necessary. We will remain by your side.
Your request will be processed within a maximum of 48 working hours.
